1.5t = ⅓ π (h/tan60º)^2 x h
1.5t = ⅓ π x [h^3]/([tan60]^2)
1.5t = (π[h^3])/(3x3)
1.5t = (π/9) x [h^3]
(13.5/π) x t = h^3
h = 3root[(13.5/π) x t]
FUCK YEAH
You celebrate with your celebratory melon but have no time to ponder whether that problem was in fact calculus (hint: it was not) because all of a sudden some bitch is eating the melon you're eating!
The proportions don't matter!!
"I SURE DO HOPE JAKE ISN'T ON THIS VERY MELON WHICH I FIND MYSELF EATING" the huge bitch (bluh bluh) posited inquisitively.
"NOOO FEMALE DON'T EAT THIS MELON I AM ON THIS MELON AND IF YOU EAT THIS MELON YOU WILL PROBABLY BUT IT IS NOT CERTAIN EAT ME BUT WHO CAN TELL THE FUTURE ANYWAY I MEAN AFTER ALL AM I NOT ASSUMING MANY THINGS AND HOW CAN I ASSUME YOU WILL EAT ME IF IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO PREDICT THE FUTURE WITH 100% ACCURACY BECAUSE THERE IS NO REASON THE FUTURE MUST BE LIKE THE PAST BECAUSE AS DAVID HUME CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED THE ONLY REASON THIS SHOULD BE SO IS BECAUSE THE FUTURE HAS ALWAYS BEEN LIKE THE PAST BUT HUME ARGUES THAT THIS IS A CIRCULAR ARGUMENT AND SO IT IS IN FACT AXIOMATIC I.E. AN ASSUMPTION THAT THE FUTURE WILL BE LIKE THE PAST SINCE IT IS UNPROVABLE FOR RATHER THE OBVIOUS EMPIRICAL DIFFICULTIES THAT VERIFYING SUCH A THING WOULD ENTAIL AND YOU KNOW WHAT THIS RATHER SIMPLE SEEMING STATEMENT HAS RATHER DIRE CONSEQUENCES FOR THE NATURAL SCIENCES AND I'D JUST LOVE TO EXPLAIN THE DETAILS OF IT ALL TO YOU BUT YOU'RE ABOUT TO EAT ME!!!!!!"
1.5t = ⅓ π x [h^3]/([tan60]^2)
1.5t = (π[h^3])/(3x3)
1.5t = (π/9) x [h^3]
(13.5/π) x t = h^3
h = 3root[(13.5/π) x t]
FUCK YEAH
You celebrate with your celebratory melon but have no time to ponder whether that problem was in fact calculus (hint: it was not) because all of a sudden some bitch is eating the melon you're eating!
The proportions don't matter!!
"I SURE DO HOPE JAKE ISN'T ON THIS VERY MELON WHICH I FIND MYSELF EATING" the huge bitch (bluh bluh) posited inquisitively.
"NOOO FEMALE DON'T EAT THIS MELON I AM ON THIS MELON AND IF YOU EAT THIS MELON YOU WILL PROBABLY BUT IT IS NOT CERTAIN EAT ME BUT WHO CAN TELL THE FUTURE ANYWAY I MEAN AFTER ALL AM I NOT ASSUMING MANY THINGS AND HOW CAN I ASSUME YOU WILL EAT ME IF IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO PREDICT THE FUTURE WITH 100% ACCURACY BECAUSE THERE IS NO REASON THE FUTURE MUST BE LIKE THE PAST BECAUSE AS DAVID HUME CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED THE ONLY REASON THIS SHOULD BE SO IS BECAUSE THE FUTURE HAS ALWAYS BEEN LIKE THE PAST BUT HUME ARGUES THAT THIS IS A CIRCULAR ARGUMENT AND SO IT IS IN FACT AXIOMATIC I.E. AN ASSUMPTION THAT THE FUTURE WILL BE LIKE THE PAST SINCE IT IS UNPROVABLE FOR RATHER THE OBVIOUS EMPIRICAL DIFFICULTIES THAT VERIFYING SUCH A THING WOULD ENTAIL AND YOU KNOW WHAT THIS RATHER SIMPLE SEEMING STATEMENT HAS RATHER DIRE CONSEQUENCES FOR THE NATURAL SCIENCES AND I'D JUST LOVE TO EXPLAIN THE DETAILS OF IT ALL TO YOU BUT YOU'RE ABOUT TO EAT ME!!!!!!"
207 views
·
May 12, 2023
Sign in to comment